Returning Videotapes
  • Movies
    • Movie Reviews
    • The List of Shame
  • Television
  • Literature
Returning Videotapes

Film & Television

Returning Videotapes
  • Movies
    • Movie Reviews
    • The List of Shame
  • Television
  • Literature
Join the community ✧
Instagram
Twitter
Goodreads
Pinterest
  • Movies
  • Movie Reviews

Jurassic World (2015). No one cares about dinosaurs anymore

  • Sofia Teixeira
  • June 11, 2015
  • No comments
  • 6 minute read
jurassic world 2015 1

This review contains spoilers.

Twenty years after the Isla Nublar incidents, someone was just dying to make the same mistake as John Hammond. Except this time around it’s not a group of scientists that is in danger, it’s 20,000 people; and the biggest threat is not T-Rex, but Indominus Rex (you know what, they were right, I didn’t even have to google it), a new dinosaur hybrid that is bigger, scarier, deadlier. The park’s newest attraction is part T-Rex, and I’m betting any Jurassic Park fan can guess what the idiots mixed it with – because hell, let’s give it a brain, just for fun.

Like its 1993 predecessor (I didn’t want to draw comparisons but the movie really invites you to, you’ll see), Jurassic World has stupid characters that do stupid things – always the fat guy who snacks – and it fully acknowledges that. And they always have excuses: this time they do it because no one cares about dinosaurs anymore, at least not the ones on display – something quite cleverly illustrated by having Zach, our 21st century Lex, boringly accepting a call from his mom while the T-Rex is fed a very innocent little goat (one of many nods to Jurassic Park).  Whereas two decades ago that helpless animal was part of a pivotal moment, now he is reduced to an act that is growing old, just like his predator.

Seeing the world’s scariest animal locked in a cage, observed by morons behind a looking glass… it completely strips him of his grandeur, and there’s something incredibly sad about that. But as I was watching the movie I wondered: would we have been content with just another showdown between man and T-Rex and little raptor action? And I surprised myself by thinking no, I don’t think we would’ve. As much as I love Jurassic Park (and you know I really do), that story has been told, and the movie was right in innovating. But did it succeed at that?

jurassic world 2015 3

The answer is not entirely clear to me and here’s why: Jurassic World is a movie of highs and lows, of confronting dualities – on one hand, it is a tribute to Jurassic Park, fan service all the way; on the other, it tries to separate itself from it, to stand on its own. While the latter was necessary, the former works both in favor and against the movie. It was great to be reminded of something we truly love, but the constant evocation of Spielberg’s film, either explicitly or subtly, had me asking how much is too much? It’s like that aunt who can’t stop talking about a family member who died years ago – it’s good to reminisce, but after a while it gets uncomfortable. And by the end of it, I got the sense that Jurassic World stood far too long in the shadow of its predecessor.

Ultimately, that’s what clouded my judgement, because all it took was John Williams’s theme to make me feel warm inside, regardless of what was happening onscreen – so you can imagine my reaction when they found the old Jurassic Park building. I half-expected Malcolm to be laying shirtless in a dark corner, but I’m guessing he never wants to set foot on Nublar again. Do you think any of them would visit the park?

God, I’m starting to sound like that aunt. Let’s talk about those Jurassic World highs and lows. The first thing that seemed off was the lack of build-up to a couple of dangerous scenarios – like how Pratt in the pit with the raptors screamed time for some action, now! – not very smooth. But once it was in full-blown disaster mode that stopped being an issue. The other little thing that annoyed me happened further down the road, when Claire and Owen are looking for the kids: as far as they know, the children are about to be eaten by Indominus, but hey, for the sake of Claire’s character development, let’s stop to pet a dying dinosaur.

jurassic world 2015 2

But bottom line, they overdid it. At first it seemed like that was kind of the point, like an action-movie meta thing, but then along came Zara’s death and by god, what the hell was that? It looked like something straight out of Piranha 3D: it just when on, and on, and on, her suffering never ending, and me just desperate to look away, until after being half-eaten by a dino-bird she and the flying thing are devoured by a dino-whale?! And the worse part is that they did it again in final battle, because of course Indominus had to be killed by raptors, a T-Rex, and that ugly whale.

Then there was the romance. Nothing against it, always up for a good love story, but I can’t help but look at it as a distraction, and that ultimately it was just not necessary. Anyway, at least it was well made – good chemistry, sexy banter – and they did try to break certain clichés, like when he offers her his hand and she just runs right through him, or the fact that their first kiss comes from her saving him. Small details, but I appreciated it.

Plus the movie itself is, again, aware of the find-your-soulmate-while-everyone-dies-around-you routine, with that hilarious bit between Vivian and Lowery. And that is really another strong suit of Jurassic World: the humor. It is smart, subtle, and on point. It truly works – if nothing else, this movie is hilarious. But there’s actually one more thing they really nailed: the thriller moments. Indominus creeping behind that first team sent out to kill him? I adequately whispered oh, fuck…! Yes, I cursed in the theater with a lady sitting right next to me, and I apologize. Because I did it again. When he creeped behind the globe vehicle.

Which, by the way, was a great idea that reminds us of the car scene in Jurassic Park with the kids inside, and that was equally well made. Prolonged moments of eminent danger are a trademark and always welcomed – except Zara’s killing, again, that was ridiculous.

jurassic world 2015 4

And then there was the glorious sequence of the raptor pack hunt with Owen, by far the coolest thing in Jurassic World, and not just because it’s my ultimate fantasy, erm. When I first saw Pratt in the pit controlling the raptors I thought it was silly, but then Grant also had a connection with the raptors. And being them born in captivity, if Owen did imprint on them the minute they were born, like he said, the whole concept is not entirely preposterous. Plus, the clash with Indominus’s dominance was quite clever.

Really I loved the whole thing, especially that they made the three female raptors actual characters. They’ve always been the star species of the franchise, but this was different, giving them names and all – I felt for them. If you told me the whole movie was made because someone envisioned that hunting scene and the raptor connection, I’d believe you and tell you it was worth it. In fact I wish it were longer, but I guess they had to make room for that stupid whale.

In short,Jurassic World is not amazing, but it’s highly entertaining and so I’m glad it got made.I’ll definitely host a double feature session of it and Jurassic Park.


LOOSE THOUGHTS
meaning, I got carried away and forgot to mention the following:

– All around fantastic cast: Jake Johnson and Lauren Lapkus were hilarious, BD Wong and Vincent D’Onofrio were appropriately hatable, and Bryce Dallas Howard was funny and sweet and fierce and so beautiful. Special love for Irrfan Khan and Omar Sy. And of course, Chris Pratt’s charisma knows no limits, I hope he continues getting leading roles.

– On that note, thank you on behalf of the female population for the male objectification: it was much easier to accept Howard’s progressive nakedness and that particularly strategic pose on the ground when you counterweighted it with shots of Pratt’s back and biceps, doing the whole alpha thing with close-ups of his gorgeous face, a little loose button here and there… well done, though I still think you owed us a little skin, it’s tradition.

– As great as the acting was, the characters were still hollow, and on that World also pales in comparison to Park.

– So she spent the whole day chasing dinosaurs in those shoes? No one believes that.

– We got a DO NOT SCREAM moment, classic.

– Okay I’ll admit that kids hugging little dinosaurs is cute, but still it’s a liiiiitle disturbing.

– So was the fact that it was winter – did I dream the Christmas jingle or did you hear it too?

– Random, but I loved that little smile on Owen’s face when he’s riding with the raptors.

– Can’t believe I forgot to mention the epic moment when Claire leaves to get the T-Rex and he emerges from the darkness like a freaking GOD to save the day. I was getting depressed thinking we wouldn’t get that glorious, nightmarish roar.

Final thought as the credits rolled:
hey guys, there’s a T-Rex on the loose, YOU ARE NOT SAFE.

sofiateixeira

Jurassic World (2015)

Jurassic World (2015)
3 5 0 1
Jurassic World is a wildly entertaining ride packed with thrilling set pieces, clever nods to the original, and self-aware humor—even if it leans too hard on nostalgia and excess. While not as masterful as Jurassic Park, it delivers enough raptor action and blockbuster fun to earn its place in the franchise.
Jurassic World is a wildly entertaining ride packed with thrilling set pieces, clever nods to the original, and self-aware humor—even if it leans too hard on nostalgia and excess. While not as masterful as Jurassic Park, it delivers enough raptor action and blockbuster fun to earn its place in the franchise.
3.0 rating
3/5
Total Score
Sofia Teixeira

Creator at Returning Videotapes, Chick with Accent on the Across The Universe Podcast, Cary Grant devotee ♡

  • Bryce Dallas Howard
  • Chris Pratt
  • Jurassic World (2015)
splendor in the grass 1961 natalie wood
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Splendor in the Grass (1961), dir. Elia Kazan

  • August 28, 2020
All That Heaven Allows 1955 3
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

All That Heaven Allows (1955)

  • March 26, 2019
The Obscure Object of Desire 1977 1
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

That Obscure Object of Desire (1977)

  • February 7, 2019
bride of frankenstein 1935
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Bride of Frankenstein (1935), dir. James Whale

  • November 28, 2018
the seventh seal 1957 movie
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

The Seventh Seal (1957), dir. Ingmar Bergman

  • October 6, 2018
the good the bad and the ugly 2
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Il Buono, Il Brutto, Il Cattivo (1966), dir. Sergio Leone

  • August 28, 2018
Brigitte Bardot in Le Mépris
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Le Mépris (1963)

  • July 31, 2018
Paths of Glory 1957 5
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Paths of Glory (1957), dir. Stanley Kubrick

  • June 28, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Featured Posts
  • splendor in the grass 1961 natalie wood 1
    Splendor in the Grass (1961), dir. Elia Kazan
    • August 28, 2020
  • All That Heaven Allows 1955 3 2
    All That Heaven Allows (1955)
    • March 26, 2019
  • The Obscure Object of Desire 1977 1 3
    That Obscure Object of Desire (1977)
    • February 7, 2019
  • bride of frankenstein 1935 4
    Bride of Frankenstein (1935), dir. James Whale
    • November 28, 2018
  • the seventh seal 1957 movie 5
    The Seventh Seal (1957), dir. Ingmar Bergman
    • October 6, 2018
Recent Posts
  • the good the bad and the ugly 2
    Il Buono, Il Brutto, Il Cattivo (1966), dir. Sergio Leone
    • August 28, 2018
  • Brigitte Bardot in Le Mépris
    Le Mépris (1963)
    • July 31, 2018
  • Paths of Glory 1957 5
    Paths of Glory (1957), dir. Stanley Kubrick
    • June 28, 2018
Returning Videotapes
Film & Art

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

🍪 Hey, we have cookies!

To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. You have the right to decline them.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
Manage preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}