Returning Videotapes
  • Movies
    • Movie Reviews
    • The List of Shame
  • Television
  • Literature
Returning Videotapes

Film & Television

Returning Videotapes
  • Movies
    • Movie Reviews
    • The List of Shame
  • Television
  • Literature
Join the community ✧
Instagram
Twitter
Goodreads
Pinterest
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Bride of Frankenstein (1935), dir. James Whale

  • Sofia Teixeira
  • November 28, 2018
  • No comments
  • 2 minute read
bride of frankenstein 1935

Being October, the pick for the Blind Spot Series could only be a horror movie. Having seen Frankenstein (1931) and hearing that Bride of Frankenstein (1935) was even better, the choice was easy enough. After the events of the first movie, the sequel begins with actress Elsa Lanchester as author Mary Shelley, revealing that the monster and the doctor are still alive.

The monster (Boris Karloff) is roaming around, trying to adjust to human life, while Doctor Frankenstein (Colin Clive) tries to create a new monster – this time, a female one. He does so with the help of Doctor Pretorius (Ernest Thesiger), who has successfully created miniature human beings (it’s as weird as it sounds).

It’s a perfect night for mystery and horror.
The air itself is filled with monsters.
— Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, in Bride of Frankenstein (1935)

The lead up to the creation of the bride takes up most of the film. In fact, we only see the bride in the final five minutes. With her being the most iconic part of the film, and the main reason I was excited to see it, Bride of Frankenstein (1935) ended up being, frankly, a disappointment. I found the monster’s dwellings pretty boring apart from a couple of funny moments, and while Pretorius’s creations were delightfully creepy and goofy, they certainly weren’t enough to make it an exciting watch.

bride of frankenstein 1935 2

I understand the moral tale behind it, on the creation of not just functioning bodies but ones with brains and heart, and the sequel does get clever with its twists and some character building (specifically on Henry’s part)… and yet. I can’t say I was a huge fan of Frankenstein so maybe this franchise is not for me, or maybe it was my own expectations surrounding the bride character that ruined it (honestly, that is one misleading title). But the truth is that personally, I found very little to hold on to and remember while watching Bride of Frankenstein.

We belong dead.
— The monster, in Bride of Frankenstein (1935)

Visually I never found Frankenstein (1931) as mesmerising as something like Dracula (1931), and Bride of Frankenstein maintains a mostly unimpressive aesthetic, with the exception of two moments: Doctor Pretorious’s laboratory, and the creation of the Bride.

It’s for that final scene, the last 5 minutes of the film, that I can say Bride of Frankenstein is worth watching. For that fleeting moment where we see the bride, even if she has no lines (how I wish I was exaggerating…!). In nothing else, props to Lanchester and the character design department for creating a bride we’ll never forget. The rest of it, we can live without.

sofiateixeira

Bride of Frankenstein (1935), dir. James Whale

Bride of Frankenstein (1935), dir. James Whale
2.5 5 0 1
Bride of Frankenstein (1935) has moments of eerie charm and iconic imagery, but despite its status as a horror classic, it fell short of expectations — especially with the titular bride appearing only briefly. While the final scene is unforgettable, the rest feels oddly lacking in energy and engagement.
Bride of Frankenstein (1935) has moments of eerie charm and iconic imagery, but despite its status as a horror classic, it fell short of expectations — especially with the titular bride appearing only briefly. While the final scene is unforgettable, the rest feels oddly lacking in energy and engagement.
2.5 rating
2.5/5
Total Score
Sofia Teixeira

Creator at Returning Videotapes, Chick with Accent on the Across The Universe Podcast, Cary Grant devotee ♡

  • Boris Karloff
  • Bride of Frankenstein (1935)
  • James Whale
  • Mary Shelley
splendor in the grass 1961 natalie wood
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Splendor in the Grass (1961), dir. Elia Kazan

  • August 28, 2020
All That Heaven Allows 1955 3
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

All That Heaven Allows (1955)

  • March 26, 2019
The Obscure Object of Desire 1977 1
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

That Obscure Object of Desire (1977)

  • February 7, 2019
the seventh seal 1957 movie
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

The Seventh Seal (1957), dir. Ingmar Bergman

  • October 6, 2018
the good the bad and the ugly 2
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Il Buono, Il Brutto, Il Cattivo (1966), dir. Sergio Leone

  • August 28, 2018
Brigitte Bardot in Le Mépris
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Le Mépris (1963)

  • July 31, 2018
Paths of Glory 1957 5
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Paths of Glory (1957), dir. Stanley Kubrick

  • June 28, 2018
Metropolis (1927) directed by Fritz Lang
View Post
  • Movie Reviews
  • Movies

Metropolis (1927), dir. Fritz Lang

  • May 28, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Featured Posts
  • splendor in the grass 1961 natalie wood 1
    Splendor in the Grass (1961), dir. Elia Kazan
    • August 28, 2020
  • All That Heaven Allows 1955 3 2
    All That Heaven Allows (1955)
    • March 26, 2019
  • The Obscure Object of Desire 1977 1 3
    That Obscure Object of Desire (1977)
    • February 7, 2019
  • bride of frankenstein 1935 4
    Bride of Frankenstein (1935), dir. James Whale
    • November 28, 2018
  • the seventh seal 1957 movie 5
    The Seventh Seal (1957), dir. Ingmar Bergman
    • October 6, 2018
Recent Posts
  • the good the bad and the ugly 2
    Il Buono, Il Brutto, Il Cattivo (1966), dir. Sergio Leone
    • August 28, 2018
  • Brigitte Bardot in Le Mépris
    Le Mépris (1963)
    • July 31, 2018
  • Paths of Glory 1957 5
    Paths of Glory (1957), dir. Stanley Kubrick
    • June 28, 2018
Returning Videotapes
Film & Art

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

🍪 Hey, we have cookies!

To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. You have the right to decline them.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Manage preferences
{title} {title} {title}